Optimism And Perseverance

I posted a comment recently about the enormous amount of optimism and perseverance required to be an actor or other artist.

One of my friends pointed out that all of the really successful people in the world -- whether they are in business or are politicians or scientists -- also share these traits. It's not unique to being an artist, and sometimes it seems like artists just keep chanting mantras of self-affirmation to themselves in order to feel special.

I agree that there's a common set of behaviors that successful people share. (In fact, if you're interested in a scientific attempt to examine those behaviors and apply them to your own life, I HIGHLY recommend The Luck Factor by psychologist Richard Wiseman.)

However, I also feel that the overall amount of optimism and perseverance required to pursue a career in acting far outstrips the demands of most other everyday jobs -- largely due to the extraordinarily high amount of financial risk and external judgment we expose ourselves to.

If I want to be a successful accountant, there is a fairly predictable education I must pursue. Then I take a standardized test, earn a CPA, and expose myself to perhaps 10 or 20 job interviews to find a position at a company. I have a good idea what my salary will be, based on data from the marketplace and reading the want ads.

I can then reasonably expect to have that job for 2-5 years, if not longer. In fact, I may only decide to leave my position when I see better opportunities. A layoff or sudden firing might happen but this is the exception, not the rule, and in fact my yearly review is largely an exercise to determine what my raise will be.

Barring the unexpected, I can manage my personal, familial, and financial obligations according to a well-defined and stable budget.

Now imagine that the only qualification to be an accountant was a willingness to carry a briefcase and put "ACCOUNTANT" on your resume.

Furthermore, all accounting jobs lasted 1-2 days, two hundred people applied for that one position, and you could only hear about job opportunities if you signed a contract with someone who combed through a private database of want ads and sent you on the jobs they thought you were qualified for. In exchange, they got 10% of your salary and you were happy to pay them when the time came.

Until then, you had to be prepared to drive all over town on short notice to interview with HR people who really just wanted to hustle you in and out as fast as possible because 199 other applicants were waiting in the hall. A good sixty percent of the time you never got called back for a second interview, much less landed that job.

You never found out WHY they were not interested, so if something was wrong with the way you presented yourself at the interview, you were on your own to figure out if you needed to go back to school for even more accounting classes and maybe even an internship or, really, you just didn't have the right briefcase.

When you did get called back, there were twenty other accountants there whose briefcases all looked exactly like yours and the only real criteria for selecting you over someone else was that the department head found the way you wrote your seven's was particularly distinct -- but not so distinct that they were weird or ugly.

Still, half of those second interviews ended with some other CPA getting hired.

When you DID get that job, you walked into the office, balanced the books for two days (often working overtime in trying conditions), and then you would immediately be fired.

Unlike a hired gun business consultant, you were not paid an unusually large amount of money for this short job because there were 19 other accountants out in the hall and even if their seven's weren't quite like yours, they'd do in a pinch if you held out for more cash.

In fact, many times you would be solicited to work for free because there were so many other accountants out there and the HR manager promised "This is a REALLY great opportunity. There's a chance THE I.R.S. might see these books! SERIOUSLY. This will be GREAT for your ledger!"

Those same HR managers would then sit on the balance sheets for months and stop returning your phone calls when you started asking for the copies they themselves promised.

The economic reality would be that for at least your first five years as an accountant you couldn't support yourself and would have to work a second job as a waiter or bartender to scrape up enough money until that big accounting gig finally came in. And God help you if you had a family to support.

Which, when you take it all in, is why I never want to be an accountant. Well, that and my unenthusiastic appreciation of math.

Almost all professions involve some level of perseverance and optimism to achieve real success. I certainly hope some brilliant geek in a lab coat keeps plugging away at a cure for cancer and doesn't give up because he thinks it will never happen or he's tired of it.

However, his career as a scientist does not continuously and repeatedly expose him to reviews that are wholly and completely subjective.

He will seldom lose his job because he looks too much like the department head's ex-boyfriend -- and in fact he can sue on this basis if that is actually the case. He will not have to apply for three grants a week and hope that every four months one of them will come through so he can keep food on the table. He will not be rejected for those grants because his teeth are too big or the department head picked an asian woman for one of the grants and he doesn't think they'd "look right" as research partners.

An actor faces so much arbitrary rejection and relentless skepticism in their daily life that if you don't believe in yourself, no one else will.

And it's not just a psychological survival tool, it's your one (and only) marketing pitch. As an artist, you have to believe you're special. That is what you are selling.

"I paint/sing/write/act in a way that other people can not. Pay me what you think that is worth."

So I do think that the very nature of the arts in America places a premium on perseverance and the optimistically dogged pursuit of opportunity. More so than in most other careers, with the biggest exception being sales.

You have to be an adventurer to be an actor.

Everyone else looks at the effort involved, the rejection you face, and the very slim odds of making a sensible living, and they walk away.

Wisely so, in most cases. Wisely so.

-Tom, who in fact often questions the sensibility of those who don't. Including himself.

Related Blog Entries

Comments
The original first title of this blog was "Why Owen Wilson Tried to Kill Himself" wasn't it?
# Posted By LizRM | 9/3/07 1:45 PM
The "original first". Nice. Good thing I'm not trying to find work as an English professor or an editor.
# Posted By LizRM | 9/3/07 1:46 PM
So another rousing day of, "hey that's great, just leave your resume and we'll see what we can do..."?

I'm thinking that you might be looking at professional philosophical waxer if you aren't careful.
# Posted By elee | 9/3/07 2:00 PM
>However, his career as a scientist does not continuously and repeatedly expose him >to reviews that are wholly and completely subjective.

Sadly, this part is not true. :)
# Posted By mark | 9/3/07 2:46 PM
Liz - The original first title of this blog was "No Seriously, Scarlett, I Promise I'm Not In It For The Publicity"

Elee - Remind me to ask you what an object is.

Mark - I liked you better with the other glasses.
# Posted By Tom | 9/3/07 3:39 PM
Tom,

You're not as alone as you think.

Re: Accountants (I know about this one). I went to the best accounting school in the nation. Only the top 10% of high school graduates in IL are even allowed to apply to the university. More than 1/2 of these are unlikely to be accepted to the business school.

Of those in the business school, many figured out that they couldn't hack the rigors of accounting. Those that made it through the first two classes were privileged to take Intermediate Accounting. 700 started that class, and 350 took the final (I don't know how many passed). Several were crying during the final.

Those continuing on got to study their ass off to take the CPA exam. Since the school was the best in the country, 50% of those taking the exam (likely to be significantly less than the 350 that finished the class) passed. Nationally, only 15% pass.

Last year, someone presented at the regional accounting conference. They said that only now, after 40 some years, could a C student in accounting get an accounting job.

Entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurs put themselves into a similar position to Actors. They must be persistent and optimistic to succeed and get funded. Most fail in startup. Like actors, some get a chance to do it again.

Scientists: The National Institute of Health only funds 7% of the grant proposals submitted to them. Venture Capitalists fund less.
# Posted By Len | 9/3/07 4:55 PM
I am officially changing my examples to "lamplighter" and "chimney sweep".
# Posted By Tom | 9/3/07 5:22 PM
Sadly, I have to agree with Len.

I may be off on this as well but if I recall from a few years ago, you told me that it would be perfectly reasonable but completely unglamorous to make a living as an actor doing voice work, industrials and stage.

Most actors are perfectly capable of supporting themselves. Will they achieve wild popularity, become recognized as one of the top 1000 performers in their field by getting paid unreasonable sums of money for a role in a movie, sitcom or commerical? Probably not, but their chances are probably at least as good, if not better, as some schlub with an accounting degree from Midwest University becoming the CFO of a Fortune 1000 company.

You're suggesting that SUCCESS in acting is somehow harder to come by than success in another field - when you should be comparing SUCCESS in any other field. Do you want to play in the NBA? Become a top executive in a successful company? Write a best seller? Be at the top of your field? Guess what? You're judged every step of the way. Maybe you aren't starving, but you're eating shit the whole way up and I'm willing to bet many of the jobs, travel, hours, soul selling, etc is just as bad and, at times, are as far away from the GOAL as they can be.

Sure Mom and Dad having money and getting you into Yale because they went there gets you those first few "commerials" in the professional world. But if Tom Cruise looked like I do, I'll bet even money his star wouldn't have been quite as meteoric in the 80s. Rags to riches is the way of LA?

77% of the people in US are a job loss or medical problem away from losing their house. You need to have a college degree to work at the Byerly's in Maple Grove if you're not bagging groceries. Fat people and short people earn less. And if you don't think people aren't judged ruthlessly and subjectively in business at the D, V and C levels (or even more so at lower levels) based on what they're wearing, carrying, saying you've spent too long telecommuting in your underwear on CF jobs for $100/hr.

My message isn't so much a "get off your high horse"- everyone goes through this as much as it is - what does SUCCESS mean to you. You went to Hollywood to further pursue something you love doing.

You are already way ahead of most of the rest of the world left sadly searching for happiness as they look for success in jobs they don't even like.

By all standards you've had a lot of "success" so far. But, what do you want? Do you want to be able to earn a living as an actor - cause I think you could have done that in MN. Do you want to be able to earn a great living as an actor, as in a house in the hills? Do you want to have the freedom to do the things you love, meet interesting people and do things few else in the world get to do?

What are you risking and sacrificing for and really are you any different than the rest of us in the risk and rejection department? Not having regular paychecks must really suck -- that much I get -- but really so many people hate what they are doing and they do it anyway to put food on their table. To me, having to get a second job to follow your dream of whatever requires less sacrifice. And it puts you in a far better position.

You are a lucky bastard -- you have a dream. Welcome to the club. Sucks getting there - don't matter the dream. Enjoy the journey.

Also, just as an aside since we brought up Philosophy, my favorite line of all-time from our friend Robb when asked by anyone about his college degree,

"What the hell do you do with a degree in Philosophy?"

his response..

"What do you do without one?"
# Posted By Glog | 9/3/07 9:04 PM
If this came off like I am complaining about my journey, I'm not. I personally have been remarkably fortunate. Most people do not move to LA and book two national commercials in the first 18 months they get here. That is NOT typical. I recognize that I am off to an extraordinary start and am certainly grateful for it.

I also know that everyone is judged, regardless of the job.

However, I still maintain that the stakes are different.

When Herb goes to his job at Mid-State Office Supply, he doesn't have to comb his hair, iron his shirt, or even smile when he's there. He just has to make sure the Accounts Receivable books are in line.

Yeah, people are going to play office politics and laugh at him behind his back, and complain to the boss about what an owly and odd guy he is.

Herb may not create the best impression, but short of committing a fire-able offense, the biggest POSSIBLE personal impact to him is that he will be unfairly discriminated against and get shorted on his raise and/or passed over for a promotion. There is a loss of earnings POTENTIAL, but there is no actual income lost.

If an actor goes to their job (and I would say that their job really is to go on auditions) and they do not create their absolute best impression, they lose 100% of that income. They are making zero dollars.

In acting, you only work when someone makes the subjective (and quite possibly arbitrary) decision to CHOOSE you. People lose gigs all the time because they weren't tall enough, or didn't have the right hair color, or just "didn't seem like a wife." I think there is a HUGE financial risk in placing your mortgage or car payment in the hands of some smug marketing manager at Ajax Bubble Company.

I also think there is a certain psychological challenge to placing yourself in an environment where you dress up, put on your best smile, and get told "no" over and over and over again.

People in the office may make fun of Herb behind his back, but they don't make him interview for his own job three times a week.

Everyone needs some optimism and perseverance to find happiness in their work. (And that's really the measure of success, isn't it?) But, as evidenced by the number of people working their jobs and hating it, those two things aren't necessary to collect a paycheck in most professions.

For actors, if you don't have those two traits, you probably won't _ever_ collect a paycheck.
# Posted By Tom | 9/4/07 1:37 AM
A moment of silence for the H-dog who recently went to the balance the great ledgers in the sky.

We'll mourn ya til we join ya.

Peace out.
# Posted By Glog | 9/4/07 5:11 AM
Maybe a less abstruse explanation of my points boils down to:

Most other professions operate on a "time in, money out" basis, where "time" equals actual on-the-job work, coupled with specialized training or experience.

Actors, on the other hand, make small and infrequent income based solely on the subjective and arbitrary whims of people who often have marginal qualifications to judge them. It is a job fraught with instability, lack of feedback, and general powerlessness.

If you want to be in the career for the long haul, you have to develop strategies to cope with that.
# Posted By Tom | 9/4/07 9:29 AM
Definition of boss: person "who often {has} marginal qualifications to judge" you
# Posted By Len | 9/4/07 8:22 PM
I think understand what Tom is talking about. After all, I am single and living in Minneapolis. Dating here sounds a lot like what Tom is describing: Basically I am paying for (as in drinks, dinner etc.; I haven't hit bottom yet!) the "opportunity" to be rejected for reasons I'll never know anything about. Maybe I'm too short, or I don't look like a potential husband, or my left ear is slightly bigger than my right ear...

Maybe my briefcase isn't big enough?

Either way there's that funny chicken and the egg problem where you won't have success without confidence, but it takes optimism and perseverance to maintain that confidence when you go long stretches without success. Tom understands this both professionally and socially (Sorry Tom, but if I’m going to look pathetic I’m taking someone down with me).

- Scott, who is not looking for sympathy but just couldn't help seeing some parallels
# Posted By Scott | 9/5/07 1:57 PM
It's true, Scott. The parallels are... almost nauseating.

I just hope that when you take that next woman out on a date she doesn't tell you to hurry up with dinner because there are 199 other guys waiting in the hallway and she really wants to get to her 7:05 slate of asian men.
# Posted By Tom | 9/5/07 2:45 PM
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9.4.001. Contact Blog Owner