Less Thinking, More Doing

I recently completed my studies with Stephen Book. Let me tell you five things I learned.

1.) Talent is something you have or you don't. Technique is something you can learn, strengthen, and -- if need be -- rely on when your talent fails you.
The American approach to acting largely seems to be based on "feeling it." There are two problems with this: 1) Feeling it may not be showing it, and 2)Your emotions are, by definition, irrational and reactive instead of disciplined and intentional. Try "feeling" a solemn, tender scene at 2am when you're on hour nineteen of the shoot, the crew is impatient, and the director is openly feuding with the producer about the overtime.

Technique gives you a baseline and framework to approach your craft. Without it, you're inconsistent.

2.) There's a difference between being relaxed and open in an audition and just "winging it."
The big difference is preparation. If you're solid with your lines and your choices, you're better able to cope with that thing that is GOING to happen which will throw you off. CDs and directors have a duty to shake you up and stretch you.

If you come in un-memorized and un-rehearsed, not only are you dealing with that inevitable curveball, but you're also dealing with your own lack of preparation. In the interests of "feelin' it", you just made your job THREE times harder.

Which brings us to the next point...

3.) Actors often get in their own way. Consciously or not, actors exhibit behavior that is self-defeating.
We want to be liked. We want to be hired. We want to control situations that are, largely, out of our control. And that makes us seem clingy, desperate, and neurotic. People will put up with that if you are a star.

They won't like it, but they'll put up with it.

If you want to be taken seriously in this business, you have to act as though you are serious about it and not like you're some desperate teenager lobbying to be prom queen.

4.) "Failure" and frustration are opportunities for growth.
One of the things that is unique about Stephen's class is that it's experiential learning. You learn by doing. You get a goal or focus for an exercise and you try to fulfill it. There are a couple of noteworthy points about this approach:

1) There's no "right" answer spoon-fed to you. You take the tools that you've learned and try to MAKE the answer that is right for you.
2) Your best growth occurs when you hit a wall and can't find the answer. It's hard, and it can be frustrating, but that's where the real development happens. Solve your own problems, and you become master of your own problems.

Moreover, if you think you're doing everything right all the time, WHY ARE YOU TAKING A CLASS?

5.) Being a professional takes hard work, commitment, and a willingness to analyze and improve. "Good enough" is, in fact, not good enough.
Nobody gets fired from being an actor, they have to decide to quit. This is an incredibly low barrier to entry for the business. It floods the marketplace with people who are average -- and no one ever got hired for being merely average. (Although there is a career in being exceptionally average. Mostly in commercials.)

There are many, many, many actors and very, very, very few paying jobs. It's a high-risk, high-reward profession. And if you're not willing to learn a technique, and commit yourself to preparing and performing to the best of your ability, you're lowering your already-slim odds.

Finally, I should say that these are largely realizations I've had over the course of my studies with Stephen. It's not drilled into you, it's experiential. These are things I've learned and observed about myself by doing exercises, performing scenes, trying, failing, and breaking through. The class will not make you a better actor, you make yourself a better actor through the class.

I've covered very little of the actual classwork or curriculum. That's intentional because of its nature. You can't learn it from the page, you have to do it. (Sounds kind of irritatingly mysterious, right? Well, it's like sky-diving: you have to jump in order to understand it.)

If you're interested in hearing more, I recommend you sign up for Stephen's free seminar. It's one of the first things I did when I moved to LA, and I'm glad I did.

-Tom, who likens the whole thing to grad school -- only much, much cheaper.

Comments
lommel - is the free seminar just going to want me to take his classes that i probably can't afford? or is the class of value by itself? (some free classes are a little sketchy...) what is his overall program again? i feel like you said it was a couple years...
# Posted By dodes | 2/23/10 10:23 PM
The seminar is primarily two things: A description of Improv Technique, and pros & cons of other traditional acting classes. If you're interested in the class, then it's a good overview of the approach and the philosophy behind it.

If now is not the right time for you to take the class, then at least it may give you some food for thought as to your training and how you want to develop yourself.

In terms of the overall program, it's a commitment - no question. The length varies from class to class, but all the pieces build on one another so you're always learning something new with the tools you've learned previously. It's not like one of these endless scene-study classes where you get on the hamster wheel and just keep putting up scene after scene after scene in an eight week rotation.
# Posted By Tom | 2/24/10 1:09 AM
Hi Tom -- How long did you take classes with Stephen? Just curious.
# Posted By Jack Welch | 2/24/10 3:54 AM
Tom,

Thanks. These insights are not only great, they port nicely over to a writing career. Or a career in curling, for that matter.
# Posted By Krunk's Next Victim | 2/24/10 8:07 AM
You are the most exceptionally average guy I know. Keep up the good work!
# Posted By Dave M. | 2/24/10 8:29 AM
Hey Dave,

Are you like me and watch an ad and think, 'Hey, why didn't they get Tom Lommel to do that ad. He is far more exceptionally average than that guy.'

Evil Grin
# Posted By Paul | 2/24/10 12:43 PM
I'm pretty sure he hails from that little town where all the kids are above average.
# Posted By Krunk's Next Victim | 2/26/10 12:33 PM
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9.4.001. Contact Blog Owner